Project 2025 is a huge document tied to Trump in many ways. Sometimes he knows nothing about it, sometimes he loves it and knows about it, and sometimes he knows it and hates it. To show you exactly how horrible Project 2025 is, QYAF is going to read through the 922 page document and write about every detail we felt we should include.
First off, the writers biographies include praise of Ronald Reagen and bragging of being part of his administration. They go on to talk about the "issue" of absent fathers in America. They claim that children who grow up without fathers go to "poverty, crime, suicide, and drug abuse". Oddly they also say that fatherlessness brings "rejection of the church" as if having no father makes you not religious, not that you need to be religious. father or not. They also target the black community in this part of the document when they talk about statistics by specifically pointing out the black community's rate of children without fathers and no other races ("Forty percent of all children are born to unmarried mothers, including more than 70 percent of black children.". After they are done with that they get into their most known part. They claim that wanting human rights is totaltalitarianism. Then immediately go on to say "The next conservative President must make the institutions of American civil society hard targets for woke culture warriors. This starts with deleting the terms sexual orientation and gender identity" TLDR; getting rid of our first ammendment rights (a move a totaltalitarian would do). The terms they claims they want to ban are "diversity, equity, inclusion" (they call that dei) "gender, gender equality, gender equity, gender awareness, gender-sensitive, abortion reproductive health, reproductive rights, and any other term used to deprive Americans of their First Amendment rights out of every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists." I'm sure you see why this is disgusting. After that they say some stuff about trans people being pedophiles and that anyone who shows that they could be transgender or any form of genderqueer should be registered as a sex offender. They outwrite tell us this here. "Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.". The fact that they think this as a reasonable thing is gross. Yes, the porn industry is gross and exploits woman, and it could be much, much better. The only issue is that what they consider pornagraphy includes people in drag, people who are genderqueer, and people who are LGBTQ+. To put this in perspective this would be saying a pride parade is a orgy. Afterwards they talk about their plans for the education system. They claim that teaching children about how they can identify should be banned and anyone who dissagrees should be "cut from federal funding immedietly". They also claim that "critical race theory" exists. I am a student myself I can tell you right now that no teacher is teaching me that im better because my skin tone is darker than anyone elses. This "critical race theory" stuff may also be infering that 1. kids get taught that white people suck (they don't, your race doesn't decide who you are) or 2. when teachers teach about historial figures not being the greatest people they are actually shouting in their faces that the POC (people of color) kids should hate the white kids. e.g. a teacher says "Christopher Columbus didn't actually discover the America's as people already lived there, and he enslaved and killed many of them." would be "critical race theory". The writers of Project 2025 show that they don't know any terms of what they are criticizing because they say "Allowing parents or physicians to 'reassign' the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end". No where in America can you give a chid a sex change, but lets say you can give a child a sex change. If the child and parent are sure that this would help their child why not? We already have doctors do operations on minors genitailia. It's not sexual for a doctor to do a sex change operation as it isn't sexual for a doctor to do a prostate exam. They claim that social media causes mental illness which may be true but only to an extent. Although social media chas shown to cause some issues it also helps promote free speech, especially on TikTok. They plan to ban TikTok, Facebook, ect. Right after this they praise the overturning of Roe v Wade, a vital law that protected womans health. Worse, they claim that that ovverturning was "just the beginning. They go on to talk about "limiting the government" by doing things such as removing the "restrictions" of the contitusion and amendments by removing them and removing the ability to add amendments, which are against the consitusion as well, not that they care. They then claim that policies on healthcare and climate are corrupt and limit policymakers job. Wait, let's roll this back. Their plan here is to remove the power to ratify ammendments so that polotitions that focus on healthcare and the climate dont limit policymakers jobs? How does that help them by going against the consitusion to limit the power to fix issues in America?